The basic human right not to be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is contained in Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Article 3 of the ECHR was enshrined in UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998 which came into force in October 2000.
Under the provisions of the Human Rights Act the UK government has a duty to ensure that no one is subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment.
Many of the rights contained in the ECHR, and the Human Rights Act, are limited or qualified. This means that there are certain circumstances in which other factors may override an individual’s human rights. However, the right to be free from torture is deemed to be so fundamental to a civilised society that it is an absolute right which cannot be overridden by any other consideration or in any circumstances.
The Definition of Torture
Torture is deliberate ill-treatment of a human being which leads to very serious suffering. Torture may be mental or physical or a combination of the two. Definitions often exclude any suffering caused by the execution of a lawful punishment or sanction. Of course, any punishment which in itself amounted to torture is unlikely to be lawful.
Treatment need not be in an organised form or include particular techniques to amount to torture. For example, if police were to beat up a prisoner in custody this could constitute torture.
The Definition of Inhuman or Degrading Treatment
Inhuman treatment may be similar to, but less severe than, torture and it may also be physical or mental in nature. It could relate to a physical attack on an individual or the conditions in which they are held. It may also include the immediate threat of torture.
Degrading treatment or punishment has a broader definition than inhuman treatment, and what is degrading may depend on the particular attributes of the person in question. For treatment to be deemed degrading other people sharing the same characteristics as that individual would have to find it degrading.
It has been decided by the courts that extreme racial discrimination could amount to degrading treatment for the purposes of human rights law. By extension other forms of discrimination might, therefore, also constitute degrading treatment.
Torture and Evidence
Much has been written on the subject of torture, particularly in relation to the questioning of terrorist subjects. Some commentators believe that torture can be morally justified in certain circumstances. An example is often given of a situation where a terrorist suspect may be withholding information about an imminent attack. If torturing that individual into revealing this information could save hundreds or even thousands of innocent lives might it be morally justifiable? The emotional, knee-jerk response to this question could be, ‘Yes’. However, the likelihood of this scenario is highly questionable.
In practice, the real (and less emotive) question about torture usually concerns the evidential value of information elicited by such means. Any evidence gained in this way could not be used in a UK court - not least of all because the evidence itself may well be unreliable. Indeed, the attempted use of such evidence could render a trial unsafe and lead to the acquittal of an individual who is in fact guilty.
The Application of the Right to Freedom From Torture
The courts apply a very strict test when considering whether there has been a breach of an individual’s right to freedom from torture or inhuman or degrading treatment. Only the very worst examples are likely to satisfy that test. However, possible circumstances in which such a claim might apply include:
The treatment received by those held in prisons or other forms of custody – including asylum detention centres;
Treatment received by patients in hospital;
The failure by public authorities to prevent a child becoming the victim of abuse;
The deportation of a foreign citizen to a country where he may then be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
The sentence imposed by a court following a conviction.
A public authority, or someone higher up a chain of command, could be held to be liable for a breach of this right even if they did not carry it out themselves or were unaware of it. So fundamental is this human right, and the duty to uphold it, that it is possible that a failure to take positive action to prevent a breach could amount to liability.
Interested in Branding, a Website or Graphic Design?
You can receieve an elegantly built, fully customised website that generates enquiries for just £399, merchandise design from £59, or illustrations from just £35, all unique to you and your brand. Check us out here.
Kaream LeChaz Foster Higgs Boson {126GeV}(Barkel Son Kaream)
{Le Chaz..The Charles}
Charles Francois Dumouriez?(01/26)
I have been wrongfully taking hostage and regularly tortured day in day out since at least around May 2018 to my knowledge but most definitely long before, possibly years.. using chemical, germ, biological & nerve agents on me daily. Replacement rem sleep clones-(digital doppelganger, synthetic, organic robotoid etc) to further false justification of torture and implications of a security issue diversion formatted false flag. (347) 262=3205 is a linked device.
Never have I been religious or directly linked to any anti government, political or racial group which has now been admitted countless times by different agencies involved with my fix up it was never a true concern, only the Higgs Boson(super weapon) and Ark of the covenant factors connected with me and my existence/creation. Now I have daily lucid dreams being utilized to falsify memories in an attempt to place my in an unfavorable light to further the agenda to justify a premature death sentence that can't be validated from the start for the reasons put forth. This was most definitely a failed false flag that was intercepted on the west side of Newark NJ in connection with organ harvesting and the fake national security distraction was to implement a form of a Patriot act to now have to address the issue of my disappearance and torture but when they tripped up on it they were force to come up with a new strategy to lower the suspicion connected with my body snatching so reverted to several methods of reasoning including but not limited to kangaroo court criminality, tiger kidnapping, medical kidnapping, drama setting(propaganda that could cause lost of life if I was to try to live anywhere following the fix up), experimental reasoning and sleep study along with disease implementation as another possible to cause certain death or decline along with blacklisting, isolating, outcast viewpoints, shaming and forced refoulment without redress. Now I have a orchestration in place to link a fabricated association along these lines in full swing and remote astral projections, traveling(01/20=night) are being used to attempt justifying torture or gaining a loop hole reasoning while having dozens of needles administered daily, glass fed to me, cuts and burns, microwaves and implants used on me non stop. I was made to watch the torturing of my 80 year old grandmother at 1440 e new york Ave Brooklyn and the offering to pay $2500 to $250.000 around labor day to anyone who could come up with a story to plant while implementation of torture is done, which shows the lack thereof. It was already argued about amongst several officials that the race card, religious or political angle was a Lost Cause as well as a recipe for disaster and beyond a benefit of a doubt would not be enough to coverup the civil and human rights violations they were trying to divert from within the intern
Victim - 22-Mar-19 @ 8:56 PM
Sorry. Please delete the duplicate comment.
We - 10-Feb-17 @ 3:29 PM
I believe there's a connection between torture and unbearable personal suffering. The purpose for which torture is used on enemy combatants is to create a psychological state of unbearable suffering and the desperation, the willingness, to do anything to end it.
This state of extreme suffering and the willingness of the victim to do anything to end it is the psychological state of a suicidal individual. The civilians who want to die do so because they're suffering unbearable personal suffering and their personal suffering is so severe that they'll do anything to end it. That's why suicidal individuals choose suicide. Their suffering is so terrible that they'd give up their life to escape it just as I'm sure people who are tortured by the military do feel.
Of course the torture done by the military is a deliberate attempt to induce a suicidal state of mind in their victims and the pain they inflict is greater in an absolute sense than what happens to civilians as a product of the cruelty in modern society and culture. In a relative sense though the psychological state and the severity of the personal suffering is similar.
The unintentional torture which causes civilians to become suicidal is, I believe, a form of torture because the suffering the individual suffers is so severe that they'll do anything to end it or escape it. I believe that there's a higher standard for civilians compared to enemy combatants but I think I think like this because I'm cruel.
We - 10-Feb-17 @ 3:27 PM
I don't really see anything that I need for my project..
Desi - 26-Apr-16 @ 4:47 PM
Just post my initial post please.He has no right to destroy this great organisation by his greed and his incompetent managers.God help us to be safe with these incompetent managers.
zrfh - 4-Nov-13 @ 7:38 PM
Well you are as bad as them. Forget it.
zrfh - 4-Nov-13 @ 7:29 PM
Freedom from Torture is such a joke.They have changed to a disgusting money making business with the CEO earning £100,000 a year. It is a commercial center not a treatment center for torture survivors.
p clarck - 4-Nov-13 @ 7:27 PM
wel the constitution is ok but it have to be improved more and more for essy life for the poor and those in needs.