How the UK Can Still Fall Short on Human Rights
The UK has built significant human rights protections into its legal system over the decades. The Human Rights Act 1998 brought the European Convention on Human Rights into domestic law, allowing people to bring claims in UK courts rather than going abroad. Even so, there are instances where UK actions have been found inconsistent with certain human rights obligations.
Some human rights cases are resolved in UK courts. Others end up at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, where judges decide whether a country has violated the Convention. Over the years, the UK has lost a number of these cases, leading to changes in law and policy.
If you believe your rights have been breached, you can use our free Rights Situation Checker to describe what has happened and get guidance on your options.

Describe what has happened and find out which UK human rights protections apply and what you can do.
Try our Rights Situation Checker free, here on this site →Cases Where the UK Has Been Found in Breach
The European Court of Human Rights has ruled against the UK on several occasions. These judgments have often prompted significant legal reforms.
One well known case involved members of the armed forces who were dismissed because of their sexuality. In 2000, the Court found that the Ministry of Defence had violated the right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the Convention. The individuals had been questioned about their sexual orientation and then discharged solely on that basis. The UK was ordered to pay compensation of £19,000 to each applicant for non-pecuniary damage, along with costs. The ruling contributed to the lifting of the ban on gay and lesbian people serving in the military.
Another area where the UK has faced criticism is prisoner voting rights. In the case of Hirst v United Kingdom, the Court ruled in 2005 that a blanket ban on all convicted prisoners voting was a breach of the right to free elections under Protocol 1, Article 3. The UK was slow to respond, and the issue remained contentious for years. Limited changes were eventually made, though the matter has remained politically sensitive.
Whole life orders have been challenged by prisoners and human rights organisations. In Vinter and Others v United Kingdom, the Court found that such sentences could raise issues under Article 3 where there was no clear and concrete possibility of review. The judgment did not say these sentences automatically amounted to inhuman or degrading treatment, but that the absence of any meaningful review mechanism was problematic. The UK has made adjustments to allow for the possibility of case reconsideration for those serving the longest sentences.
Cases involving surveillance and privacy have reached Strasbourg too. The Court has examined whether UK intelligence agencies have operated within proper legal boundaries when intercepting communications. In some instances, it found that safeguards were lacking, prompting reforms to oversight arrangements.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
What Happens After a Judgment
When the European Court of Human Rights finds a violation, the UK is expected to take steps to address the problem. This can mean paying compensation to the individuals affected, changing laws, or altering how public bodies operate.
The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe monitors whether countries comply with European Court of Human Rights judgments. Most of the time, the UK does make the required changes, though the speed and extent of reform can vary. Some rulings lead to swift legislative action. Others spark lengthy political debate.
Not every complaint to the Court succeeds. According to Court statistics, the majority of applications are declared inadmissible because the applicant has not exhausted domestic remedies or because the complaint does not fall within the scope of the Convention. The Court only considers cases where all reasonable options within the UK legal system have been tried first.
It is also worth noting that Brexit has not affected the UK's relationship with the European Court of Human Rights, which is separate from the European Union. However, there is ongoing debate within the UK government about potential reforms to the Human Rights Act 1998, which could affect how Convention rights are enforced domestically in the future.
Bringing a Human Rights Claim in the UK
If you think a public authority has breached your human rights, you may be able to take action without leaving the UK. The Human Rights Act allows you to bring claims in domestic courts against bodies such as the police, local councils, the NHS, and government departments.
You will usually need to act within a time limit of one year from the date of the alleged breach, though courts can extend this in some circumstances. Legal aid may be available depending on your financial situation and the type of case. Citizens Advice and the Equality and Human Rights Commission can provide guidance on where to get help.
Going to the European Court of Human Rights is generally a last resort. You must first exhaust all available remedies in the UK, which usually means going through the courts up to the highest level relevant to your case. The process can take several years.
For detailed information on making a claim, see guidance on GOV.UK or contact a solicitor with experience in human rights law. Organisations such as Liberty and Justice also offer resources and, in some cases, legal support for people whose rights have been violated.
So I beg I'm plead with every last ounce of hope I have remaining if there is anybody who could assist me and guide me through what I already fail to be true until substantiate some information for me and perhaps even help me take this to the courts I will pay you whatever you want I will give my compensation I just want your
If you find me on YouTube I am called the journeyman look for journey's law also on blue sky
This is my ca
PS: Sorry for the mistakes but English is my second language.
They then stated that the warning would stay on file for six months and if I'm not in any trouble in that time, it will be removed. I asked them does that mean it has now expired as the (alleged) incident took place six months ago. They said no because they were warning me today. I refused there offer of a warning and told them to come and charge me. They refused and insisted that this is dealt with by a warning again stating it would stay on file for six months. Again, I told them I would not accept this bit they would not give way. I stated if they insist on this, I am stating that I believe this to be infringing my 'human rights' as they are given me a twelve month warning. They hummed away saying that there was nothing they could do.
I finished by telling the police that as far as I was concerned they didn't have any reason to charge me and the evidence they referred to could not be used in court due to certain legal technicalities, which they acknowledged. However, they finished by again stating that this time they are 'just giving me a warning'. I said goodbye and hung up. They didn't call back.
Where do I stand on this?
this in happening in the uk
anon due to fear of severe retribution
I am scared that when I have a new child, which I am already planning, that my children will continue to be supervised in a contact centre and I refuse to bring my new child into that environment which my partner would not allow. I don't know what to do. I cant move forward with my children and my future marriage and future children with them still oppressing me. I am thinking of European courts and I am taking steps to remove my British citizenship so that when my children grow up I have no assosciation to 'britain' whatsoever.
Trial @ mag court i had leagal reprasentation as reppn myself. Court said it unfare 4me 2cross examin as ov assult charge. Duty solicitor appointed only 2 cross examin (usless) left on own rest ov case..
Case can be seen if Google
Anton Carpena v CPS
Anton Carpena v National Crime Agency
Point is that the UK Courts are Corrupt and there is no justice in the UK
So I attended his school to pick him up on my day to have him and my ex try ed to stop me taking him. She had her phone sticking up out of her pocket on record like she has done for the last 6 months and try ed to get me arrested over 50 calls to police in 2 months no charges at all on any ocasion. However this has had no effect on her constantly trying to entrap me or coax me in to doing crime so she can use it against me in family court. On this ocasion I try ed to take her phone off her to stop it recording there was a bit of a struggle with the phone then I fell over as she let go I was arrested for abh after she claimed I grabbed her wrist and have broken it with one hand as I had my son in other arm can anyone help me with any info regarding her trying to make me assault her is it legal to torment someone till they crack she has had her brother freten to kill me 4 times by way of petrol bomb to my van whilst I'm in it. Do I have any rights ??? I had a court order and she still did not care
In the past yrs since being there.i have been so badly treated. I have also been raped and was told by police that it was my own fault even thoigh mrdical evidence had proved my cervix had been torn. I feel completely alone and let down by the way i have been treated..i have nightmares...my husband is so worried. Do i actually have any rights anymore?
Ask About Human Rights a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.